Understanding Mexico's economic landscape via data transformations

Stay informed with the latest insights on Mexico's economy via statistics and AI analysis and synthesis.

Palacio de Bellas Artes, picture by David Carballar
Banxico Minutes composite_score: new observation 2026-05-07 (0)

Banxico Minutes composite_score: new observation 2026-05-07 (0)

Lead topic: Banxico Minutes
expected policy rate after next MPD

6.39%

last updated

4 July 2026

next Monetary Policy Decision

in 33 days

policy rate today

6.5 %

Last Decision: +0.00 %

News Roundup

Updated: 2026-07-04


General Policy

The Mexican Stock Exchange (BMV) fell by 0.25%, marking its third consecutive week of decline. Meanwhile, Wall Street experienced a pause in trading due to the July 4 holiday, leading to a quieter market environment. — El Financiero, 04 Jul 2026. Read more


The Mexican peso closed stable against the dollar, finishing the week with a moderate accumulated advance. The exchange rate showed resilience, reflecting market dynamics without significant fluctuations. This stability comes amid ongoing economic assessments and policy considerations. — El Economista, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


The article highlights ten prominent UK companies operating in Mexico, including HSBC and Diageo, the owner of Johnnie Walker. These companies are noted for their significant financial contributions to the Mexican economy, showcasing their successful business operations in the region. — Expansión, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


The Mexican peso gained value against the US dollar at the close of the first week of July. This development reflects ongoing market dynamics and economic conditions influencing the exchange rate. The article provides insights into the peso's performance without detailing specific figures or rates. — El Financiero, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


Mexico and England are set to enhance their economic collaboration despite their rivalry on the soccer field. The article highlights the importance of bilateral trade and investment, emphasizing shared interests in various sectors. Both nations aim to leverage their strengths to foster mutual growth and development. — Expansión, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


Monetary Policy

The Mexican peso experienced a slight appreciation against the US dollar during a day of reduced trading activity. The article highlights the current market dynamics without providing specific figures or detailed analysis. — El Economista, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


The article discusses how artificial intelligence is becoming a crucial driver for Mexico's export sector. It highlights the role of AI in enhancing productivity and competitiveness among Mexican companies. Experts emphasize the need for investment in AI technologies to sustain this growth and adapt to global market demands. — El Financiero, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


The Mexican peso has depreciated against the dollar following the United States' decision not to extend the T-MEC agreement. This development has raised concerns among Mexican officials, including President Claudia Sheinbaum, about the potential economic implications. The situation is being closely monitored by Banxico Governor Victoria Rodríguez Ceja and other financial authorities. — El Economista, 01 Jul 2026. Read more


In June, the Mexican peso depreciated by 0.91% against the US dollar. This decline reflects ongoing fluctuations in the currency market. The article does not provide additional context or reasons for this depreciation. — El Economista, 01 Jul 2026. Read more


The Mexican peso experienced a notable depreciation throughout June. The article details the extent of this decline, highlighting the factors contributing to the peso's weakening against the dollar. Specific figures regarding the depreciation are provided, illustrating the currency's performance during the month. — El Financiero, 30 Jun 2026. Read more


International Coverage

Trump refuses to renew US-Canada-Mexico trade pact he once championed — The Guardian, 01 Jul 2026. Read more


Mexico Deficit Reaches MX$418.7 Billion, Below Forecast: SHCP — Google News, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


Mexico Bets on Domestic Production After USMCA Review Deal — Google News, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


Trump won’t renew trade deal with Mexico and Canada. He would be foolish not to extend it — Google News, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


US Halts USMCA Renewal; There Will Be Annual Reviews: Ebrard — Google News, 03 Jul 2026. Read more


Trump Won't Renew USMCA: What Happens to U.S., Canada & Mexico Trade? — Google News, 02 Jul 2026. Read more


USMCA Review Cycle Deepens Uncertainty for Mexico, Warns Societe Generale — Google News, 02 Jul 2026. Read more


U.S. Declines to Renew Trade Pact With Mexico And Canada. Here's What It Means for Each Country — Google News, 02 Jul 2026. Read more


USMCA 'remains in force,' Ebrard says, as Mexico eyes tariff reductions: Thursday's mañanera recapped — Google News, 02 Jul 2026. Read more


Mexican peso depreciates after US declines to renew USMCA — Google News, 02 Jul 2026. Read more


Banxico Holds Steady as Markets Brace for Next Moves

Updated: 2026-06-27 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Following the May 7, 2026 decision, Banxico's policy rate stands at 6.50%.
  • Relative to the United States, the Fed's target rate now sits at 3.62%, creating a significant rate differential of 2.88%.
  • The rate differential creates a complex landscape for capital flows and foreign exchange pressures.
CommentaryBackground

Following the May 7, 2026 decision, Banxico's policy rate stands at 6.50%. After Banxico's May 7 meeting, the target rate remains at 6.50%, following a recent cut of 0.25%. The current policy stance has held steady since then, as the committee grapples with easing headline inflation but remains wary of global inflationary pressures and local economic uncertainties. This marks a pivotal moment in their strategy, as they weigh the need for stimulus against potential inflationary threats and structural weaknesses in the economy.

Relative to the United States, the Fed's target rate now sits at 3.62%, creating a significant rate differential of 2.88%. The Fed's target rate currently stands at 3.62%, reflecting a cautious stance similar to Banxico’s. With a rate differential of 2.88%, this gap creates implications for capital flows, as investors weigh potential returns against risks in both economies. Banxico’s decisions are increasingly influenced by the need to maintain economic stability amid domestic pressures, while the Fed continues its own trajectory of monetary policy adjustments.

The rate differential creates a complex landscape for capital flows and foreign exchange pressures.

The central bank's policy rate is the primary tool for steering inflation and economic activity. Banxico targets 3% annual inflation and adjusts its overnight interbank rate to influence borrowing costs throughout the economy. The rate differential with the United States affects capital flows and exchange rate dynamics — a wider spread can attract foreign investment but may constrain domestic credit. Policy decisions are announced roughly every six weeks following scheduled monetary policy meetings.

Banxico's Next Move: High Probability of Holding Rates Amid Rising Concerns

Updated: 2026-07-04 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • With the modal bin shifting to ±0bp, the model points toward likely inaction as Banxico approaches its next meeting on 05 February 2026.
  • Recent data updates show mixed results, particularly in inflation and energy prices.
  • Cautious economic indicators create a complex backdrop for Banxico's decision-making process.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

With the modal bin shifting to ±0bp, the model points toward likely inaction as Banxico approaches its next meeting on 05 February 2026. Markets are currently pricing in a substantial chance of no action, with a hold probability around 58% according to our model-based expectations. This indicates a notable shift from the previous modal bin of -25bp, reflecting a cautious stance as policymakers weigh mixed signals in the economy. The expected move is a hold, with the mean probability suggesting a slight cut of -11bp for the upcoming decision date. The model also highlights a considerable chance of a -25bp cut at about 39%.

Recent data updates show mixed results, particularly in inflation and energy prices. Key driver variables, including CPI and bond yields, received new observations that suggest inflation ticked higher, while credit spreads remain stable. This data refresh is critical as it frames the current economic landscape for Banxico, but overall conditions remain largely unchanged since the last update.

Cautious economic indicators create a complex backdrop for Banxico's decision-making process. Moderate hawkish pressure stems from rising global energy prices and deteriorating public security, which 40% of economists cite as a top concern. Conversely, stable credit spreads exert a slight dovish pull on the committee's considerations. Notably, the economic-policy uncertainty proxy is highly influential, signaling that the actual decision will depend heavily on committee judgment rather than just model mechanics.

Ordered Probit Probabilities

Rate Change 04 Feb 05 Feb 2026 Δ
Cut 58.4% 42.0% -16.4
Hold 41.6% 58.0% +16.4
Hike 0.0% 0.0% +0.0
E[Δrate] -17.5 bp -11.3 bp +6.2 bp

Probabilities in %. Modal bin in bold. E[Δrate] = probability-weighted expected change in basis points.

When markets and the public can anticipate how and why the central bank acts, uncertainty falls and policy becomes more effective. Clear communication helps businesses plan investments, households make borrowing decisions, and international investors gauge currency risks. Economists often stress the importance of clarity and traceability — the ability to follow and understand decisions step by step. Without it, rate moves risk being misread, causing volatility instead of stability. With it, policy signals are more credible, anchoring expectations and strengthening the central bank's influence.

Rate-change probabilities are estimated using an ordered probit model with eight macroeconomic and financial drivers: consumer price inflation (CPI), consumer confidence, the 30-day peso/dollar change, the CETES 28-day spread, stock market growth, the yield curve slope (10Y minus 2Y), Mexico's Economic Policy Uncertainty index, and the Fed-Banxico rate differential. The model maps these drivers into probability bins for the next monetary policy decision, ranging from cuts of 50 basis points or more to hikes of the same magnitude. Coefficients are estimated on the historical record of Banxico decisions and their pre-decision data environment. Probabilities update daily as driver series refresh and should be treated as one input among many.

Out-of-sample backtest across 24 past meetings: the modal prediction matched the actual decision 46% of the time, directional accuracy (hike/hold/cut) was 67%, Brier score 0.720. Out-of-sample backtest across 24 past meetings: the modal prediction matched the actual decision 46% of the time, directional accuracy (hike/hold/cut) was 67%, Brier score 0.720. Lower Brier scores indicate better-calibrated probability forecasts.

Mexican Yield Curve Signals Caution Amid Inflationary Pressures

Updated: 2026-07-04 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Bond prices as of 2026-07-04 show the 10Y-3Y spread at 1.44%, reflecting a stable environment despite recent geopolitical tensions.
  • The curve shape suggests markets are aligned with a likely hold on rates during Banxico's upcoming policy meeting.
CommentaryMethodologyBackground

Bond prices as of 2026-07-04 show the 10Y-3Y spread at 1.44%, reflecting a stable environment despite recent geopolitical tensions. The latest yield curve data reveals the nominal 10Y-3Y spread at 1.44%, up 0.11% from the previous observation. Real spreads are also showing stability at 0.53%, while the implied inflation spread stands at 0.91%, indicating that markets expect some inflation in the future but not an overwhelming surge. The inversion history is noteworthy, with the last nominal spread inversion ending a year ago, which suggests a return to normalcy in yield curve dynamics. This situation highlights cautious optimism among investors, even as they remain vigilant about inflationary signals.

The curve shape suggests markets are aligned with a likely hold on rates during Banxico's upcoming policy meeting. Markets appear to be pricing in a stable policy environment, consistent with expectations of a rate hold, given the 75% probability assigned to such a move. However, the backdrop of geopolitical tensions and rising energy prices introduces uncertainty, which could challenge the current equilibrium. This disconnect between a stable yield curve and the underlying economic risks suggests that investors are weighing the potential for volatility against the central bank's commitment to maintaining inflation expectations.

Yield Spread Update

Spread (10Y−3Y) 02 Jul 03 Jul 2026 Δ NS-DFM
Nominal 1.46 1.44 -0.019 1.22
Real 0.53 0.53 -0.002 0.96
Inflation 0.93 0.91 -0.017 0.26

All values in percentage points. NS-DFM = Nelson-Siegel Dynamic Factor Model filtered estimate.

When investors and businesses trust that monetary policy will remain credible and predictable, long-term interest rates respond more smoothly to central bank signals. Yield curve spreads between long and short maturities serve as a real-time gauge of this alignment: a stable, upward-sloping curve suggests markets expect gradual normalization, while persistent inversions often signal that markets anticipate policy shifts before they are announced. For Mexico, where inflation targeting depends on anchoring expectations across a diverse investor base, the 10-year minus 3-year spread offers a compact summary of whether policy communication is landing as intended.

Yield curve spreads are filtered using a Nelson-Siegel Dynamic Factor Model (NS-DFM) estimated on weekly data. The model ingests 16 synthetic yield curve points — 11 nominal maturities (overnight through 30 years) and 5 real maturities (overnight through 30 years) — fitted via Nelder-Mead optimization on Banxico bond prices. Factor loadings follow the Diebold-Li (2006) Nelson-Siegel parameterization, decomposing each yield curve into level, slope, and curvature components for both real rates and implied inflation. The Kalman smoother extracts filtered spread estimates that track the underlying signal in daily bond market noise.

So…what is this—and why am I doing it?

This project began with a simple question in 2021: how much of the work of producing useful economic information can we hand over to machines? Monitoring Monetary Policy in Mexico is a thought experiment at that frontier. By combining statistical analysis, tailored visualizations, and large language models, it demonstrates how even highly specialized topics—such as Mexican monetary policy—can be made more accessible, relevant, and insightful. Meanwhile, the system is designed to run without human intervention on a daily basis. My role is to set the design; the automation carries it out.

When does data stop being a dump and start being a story?

The initiative builds on my earlier Monitoring Mexico project but has since evolved in important ways. Data is no longer simply displayed; it is analyzed, distilled, forecasted, visualized, interpreted, narrated, and contextualized. Large language models help transform both raw and modeled data into context, turning numbers into stories. In short, raw information is transformed into understanding.

Who’s in charge here—a Raspberry Pi or common sense?

Behind the scenes, the site runs on a Raspberry Pi 5 powered by Python and a library of custom routines. Automation drives much of the process, but human expertise remains essential in designing the explanation and presenting the material. The balance between machine efficiency and human judgment is what makes the project work.

How do we cut through the jargon and keep the signal?

The aim is straightforward: to bring clarity to an area often obscured by technical detail. Monetary policy shapes households, firms, and markets, yet its analysis usually remains confined to experts. By filtering, explaining, and visualizing the data, this project seeks to make that knowledge more transparent and more useful.

Is this the 80/20 rule you learn in business school in the wild?

At its core, the site is both a contribution to public understanding and an exploration of how informational value is created. It is a humble attempt to deliver 80% of the insights of a central bank analysis with 20% of the resources—while also testing what the future of knowledge generation might look like.

What might be new the next time you drop by?

This is very much a work in progress, with new features, analyses, and visualizations added over time. We can now at the brink of generating our very own economic policy uncertainty (EPU) index, and we consider a newsletter. But maybe a chatbot might be more appropriate? Coming back to check for updates is always a good idea. If the site sparks curiosity, fosters dialogue, or simply helps illuminate Mexico’s economic dynamics, it has achieved its goal.

Headline inflation shows a notable decline, but core pressures remain elevated, signaling ongoing challenges for Banxico.

Updated: 2026-06-25 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • The mid-June 2026 CPI release shows headline inflation at 3.58%, landing within Banxico's target band yet revealing a downward trend.
  • Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, remains higher than headline figures, suggesting persistent underlying price pressures.
  • Trade prices reveal a stark contrast, with export prices surging while import prices stabilize, indicating complex global market interactions.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

The mid-June 2026 CPI release shows headline inflation at 3.58%, landing within Banxico's target band yet revealing a downward trend. The mid-June 2026 CPI release shows headline inflation at 3.58%, around the 29th percentile, and comfortably within Banxico's 2%-4% target band. This rate marks a decrease of 0.10 from the previous release, continuing a six-month streak of declining growth. While the current figure indicates some relief for consumers, it also highlights that inflation dynamics are still at play, with pressures likely lingering beneath the surface.

Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, remains higher than headline figures, suggesting persistent underlying price pressures. Core inflation, which excludes volatile components, is currently at 4.21%, sitting in the 67th percentile. This marks a slight decrease of 0.01 compared to the last reading, indicating a divergence from the headline rate. The core figure is still above the 3% target, reflecting that while headline inflation shows signs of easing, the underlying inflationary pressures remain a concern for policymakers, necessitating careful monitoring.

Trade prices reveal a stark contrast, with export prices surging while import prices stabilize, indicating complex global market interactions. Trade prices are experiencing significant movements, particularly with export prices soaring to 15.25%, placing them in the 93rd percentile. This reflects a 0.12 increase from last month and underscores the strong international demand dynamics, which can impact domestic inflation. Meanwhile, import prices are up at 4.41%, indicating that while imports are becoming pricier, they are not rising as sharply as exports, complicating the inflation narrative further.

1H Jun 2026 1H Jun 2027
Series Current Prev. Fcast Error 12M Fcast Prev. 12M Rev.
Headline CPI 3.6 4.7 4.7 +0.00
Core CPI 4.2 4.2 4.2 +0.00
Export Price Index 4.9 4.9 +0.00
Import Price Index 5.0 5.0 +0.00

All values in percentage points (YoY, seasonally adjusted). "Error" = actual minus previous forecast. "Revision" = change in 12-month outlook since last update. "—" = no prior forecast available.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures changes in the cost of a representative basket of goods and services purchased by Mexican households. Banxico targets 3% annual inflation with a tolerance band of 2%-4%. Core CPI — which excludes volatile food and energy prices — reveals underlying inflation trends that guide monetary policy. Import and export price indices extend the picture by linking Mexico's inflation dynamics to global markets, trade flows, and currency movements.

Headline CPI, core CPI, export prices, and import prices are projected six months ahead using a Vector Autoregression (VAR). The four series are estimated jointly, so each informs the others' forecasts through lagged interactions. Projections update each time new CPI data arrive and may shift materially after revisions.

Out-of-sample backtest over 69 evaluation windows using the Vector Autoregression (VAR). Out-of-sample backtest over 69 evaluation windows using the Vector Autoregression (VAR). RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. Headline CPI (RMSE 1.09 vs 1.03 naive, n=69); Core CPI (RMSE 0.65 vs 1.07 naive, +39% improvement, n=69); Export Price Inflation (RMSE 7.27 vs 7.77 naive, +6% improvement, n=56); Import Price Inflation (RMSE 2.99 vs 2.05 naive, n=56).

Mexican House Price Inflation Remains Elevated Amid Mixed Signals

Updated: 2026-06-26 by Alexander Dentler

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • The recent update from the SHF House Price Index reveals significant insights into the state of the housing market, particularly with the new observation of 8.71% YoY inflation as of 2026-01-01.
  • The DFM nowcast provides valuable context, estimating house price inflation at 8.65% YoY as of 2026-05-01.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

The recent update from the SHF House Price Index reveals significant insights into the state of the housing market, particularly with the new observation of 8.71% YoY inflation as of 2026-01-01. This level of house price inflation exceeds historical averages, positioning itself in the 75th percentile since 2006. In comparison, headline CPI inflation stands at 3.94% while housing CPI inflation is at 3.61%, suggesting that house prices are rising notably faster than general inflation metrics. This divergence reflects the ongoing demand pressures in the housing sector, despite a slight decline of 0.21 percentage points from the previous quarter.

The DFM nowcast provides valuable context, estimating house price inflation at 8.65% YoY as of 2026-05-01. This nowcast aligns closely with the latest observed value, indicating that auxiliary indicators such as mortgage lending and housing CPI are confirming the current trajectory rather than suggesting any significant upward or downward pressure. The model's consistency with observed data suggests that the dynamics within the housing market remain robust and supportive of sustained inflationary trends.

DFM Nowcast Comparison

Observed Nowcast Prev. Nowcast Gap Revision
SHF House Price Inflation (YoY) 8.71% 8.65% 8.65% -0.06 +0.00

Observed: 2026-Q1. Nowcast: 2026-05. Previous nowcast: 2026-05. "Gap" = nowcast − observed. "Revision" = change in nowcast since previous run.

The SHF House Price Index is published quarterly by Sociedad Hipotecaria Federal, Mexico's federal mortgage development bank, typically around 40 days after the reference quarter ends. It is constructed from mortgage appraisal data (avalúos) using a Case-Shiller repeat-sales methodology, with breakdowns by state, new vs. used housing, and market segment (affordable vs. mid-to-high-end). Because the index reflects prices at the point of mortgage origination, it captures credit-driven demand rather than asking prices, making it a tighter gauge of actual transaction values and collateral quality across the housing market.

A Dynamic Factor Model (DFM) filters the quarterly SHF House Price Index using five Banxico auxiliary series — the funding rate, mortgage lending volumes, a housing purchase survey indicator, the SPF unemployment forecast, and construction activity — plus two CPI components (headline and housing subcategory). The model extracts a common factor from these seven indicators, producing a smoothed nowcast that updates between quarterly SHF releases whenever auxiliary data arrive. This filtered estimate helps distinguish persistent trends from quarterly noise in the observed house price series.

Out-of-sample backtest over 12 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). Out-of-sample backtest over 12 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. House Price Nowcast (RMSE 1.32 vs 0.66 naive, n=12).

Commodity Prices Surge: Impacts on Mexico's Economy

Updated: 2026-06-06 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Brent oil prices just jumped to $106.30 as of May 2026, reflecting a staggering YoY increase of 65.8%.
  • Copper prices are hitting $13,483.75, up 41.5% YoY as of May 2026.
  • Corn prices are at $215.62, reflecting a modest YoY increase of 5.3%.
CommentaryBackground

Brent oil prices just jumped to $106.30 as of May 2026, reflecting a staggering YoY increase of 65.8%. Brent oil prices through May 2026 show a notable rise, landing at $106.30. This marks a significant YoY change of +65.8%, and the momentum is clearly up, with prices climbing in recent days. For Mexico, where oil is a major export and accounts for about 15% of federal revenue, these figures are crucial — they could bolster government finances and Pemex operations.

Copper prices are hitting $13,483.75, up 41.5% YoY as of May 2026. With copper data updated to May 2026, the current price stands at $13,483.75, showcasing a robust YoY increase of 41.5%. The trend remains upward, indicating strong demand in the global market. Given that Sonora dominates copper production in Mexico, this surge could enhance regional economic activity, despite the sector's small employment footprint.

Corn prices are at $215.62, reflecting a modest YoY increase of 5.3%. As of May 2026, corn prices reached $215.62, showing a slight YoY rise of 5.3%. The trend appears stable, neither soaring nor plummeting significantly. This is particularly relevant for Mexico, where corn is a staple for many, and price stability is key for the 1.5 million smallholder farmers dependent on this crop.

Commodity prices feed directly into Mexico's inflation pulse and terms of trade. Oil and corn affect energy and food costs, while copper is a proxy for global industrial demand. For policymakers, sharp commodity swings can shift inflation expectations and fiscal balances, making these prices critical to monitor.

Latest Wage Dynamics Reveal Diverging Trends in Labor Costs and Purchasing Power

Updated: 2026-06-24 by Ignacio Crane

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • The April 2026 IMSS release shows unit labor costs at 3.34%, indicating that wages are growing faster than productivity.
  • Real wages in the formal sector rose to 4.49%, signifying an improvement in purchasing power for workers.
  • Across sectors, a notable divergence emerges as retail outperforms manufacturing in real wage growth.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

The April 2026 IMSS release shows unit labor costs at 3.34%, indicating that wages are growing faster than productivity. Following April's formal sector wage data, ULC in manufacturing is rising, reflecting a modest deceleration in productivity gains. The growth rate increased by 0.47, positioning it in the 79th percentile historically. This suggests potential cost-push inflation pressures that could affect the competitiveness of the manufacturing sector moving forward.

Real wages in the formal sector rose to 4.49%, signifying an improvement in purchasing power for workers. This increase in real wages indicates positive gains for households, enhancing their ability to sustain consumption amid rising costs. While the overall trend is encouraging, it is essential to acknowledge that the year-over-year growth has diminished slightly by 1.7%, which could temper expectations for sustained gains.

Across sectors, a notable divergence emerges as retail outperforms manufacturing in real wage growth. Retail real wages have grown at a commendable 4.49%, contrasting sharply with manufacturing's 3.12%. This divergence underscores the contrasting dynamics within the labor market, where retail workers are benefitting more significantly from wage increases, while manufacturing remains constrained by rising labor costs.

SARIMAX Forecast Comparison

Series Current Prev. Forecast Error 12M Forecast Prev. 12M Revision
ULC Manufacturing 0.3 0.3 +0.00
ULC Retail 1.4 1.4 +0.00
Real Wage Mfg 3.0 3.0 +0.00
Real Wage Retail 4.3 4.3 +0.00

All values in % (MoM, seasonally adjusted). "Error" = actual − previous forecast. "Revision" = change in 12-month outlook. "—" = no prior forecast available.

Unit labor costs (ULC) measure the average cost of labor per unit of output — when wages grow faster than productivity, ULC rises, potentially squeezing profit margins and fueling inflation. In Mexico, where the formal sector employs roughly half the workforce, IMSS-registered wage data captures trends in the formal economy but misses the informal sector's dynamics. Real wages — nominal wages adjusted for inflation — determine household purchasing power and underpin consumer demand. For policymakers, these indicators help balance inflation control, competitiveness, and the economic welfare of Mexican workers.

Twelve-month-ahead forecasts for unit labor costs and real wages in manufacturing and retail are produced using a Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous inputs (SARIMAX) model. The model is estimated on seasonally adjusted month-over-month percentage changes, with all four series — ULC manufacturing, ULC retail, real wage manufacturing, and real wage retail — entering as joint endogenous variables. No external auxiliary data feed the forecast; the model relies solely on the internal dynamics and cross-series interactions of the wage and productivity data. Forecast confidence intervals widen over the projection horizon.

Out-of-sample backtest over 24 evaluation windows using the SARIMAX. Out-of-sample backtest over 24 evaluation windows using the SARIMAX. RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. ULC Manufacturing (RMSE 2.97 vs 3.21 naive, +7% improvement, n=24); ULC Retail (RMSE 5.33 vs 5.22 naive, n=23); Real Wage Manufacturing (RMSE 2.20 vs 2.62 naive, +16% improvement, n=24); Real Wage Retail (RMSE 3.05 vs 2.97 naive, n=23).

GDP Nowcast Update: Real GDP Growth Surges to 4.96%

Updated: 2026-06-19 by Pablo Rivas

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Following the recent updates in key economic indicators, real GDP growth in Mexico is now estimated at 4.96%, reflecting a robust upward revision of 2.66%.
  • Private consumption continues to be a key driver of growth.
  • Exports are struggling to keep up with domestic demand.
  • Imports are indicating a shift in domestic absorption patterns.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

Following the recent updates in key economic indicators, real GDP growth in Mexico is now estimated at 4.96%, reflecting a robust upward revision of 2.66%. The latest quarterly GDP release from INEGI shows a marked increase in growth expectations, signaling a healthier economic outlook. This adjustment highlights a strong recovery trajectory, likely driven by resilient domestic consumption and improved industrial performance. As we advance into Q1 2026, this optimistic figure may bolster confidence among investors and policymakers alike.

Private consumption continues to be a key driver of growth. Household spending is estimated to have soared to 8.09%, significantly outpacing GDP growth. This robust expansion suggests that consumers are confident and willing to spend, providing essential support to overall economic activity. Such vigor in private consumption is a positive sign, signaling a thriving domestic market that can help buffer against external shocks.

Exports are struggling to keep up with domestic demand. External demand remains tepid, with export growth now at a mere 0.58%. This lackluster performance raises concerns about Mexico's competitiveness in the global market, especially as trading partners navigate their own economic uncertainties. The soft export figures could hint at challenges ahead for sectors reliant on international trade, potentially dampening the overall growth outlook.

Imports are indicating a shift in domestic absorption patterns. Imports have contracted to 1.56%, reflecting a 3.81% decline from previous estimates. This downturn signals a potential cooling in domestic demand, as consumers and businesses may be becoming more cautious in their spending habits. The drop in imports could also suggest that the economy is adjusting to current market conditions, though it may raise questions about future growth sustainability.

Net trade dynamics appear to be shifting. The trade balance contribution remains a mixed bag, as the decline in imports coupled with stagnant export growth presents a complex scenario. While fewer imports can ease some pressure on the trade deficit, the sluggish export performance raises flags about Mexico's economic resilience in a challenging global landscape. Policymakers will need to monitor these trends closely to ensure balanced and sustainable growth.

DFM GDP Nowcasts

Component Last Obs. (Q1 2026) Nowcast (Q1 2026) Prev. Nowcast Revision
Real Gross Domestic Product 6.19% 4.96% 4.96% +0.00
Private Consumption 0.15% 8.09% 8.09% +0.00
Imports 25.37% 1.56% 1.56% +0.00
Exports 0.58% 0.58% 0.58% +0.00

QoQ annualized, seasonally adjusted. Nowcast = DFM filtered estimate using higher-frequency inputs. "Revision" = change from previous run.

Real activity data tracks the economy's engine — output, spending, and trade — while nowcasts bridge the lag between releases. Real GDP captures total production; private consumption reflects household demand; exports and imports reveal external demand and the flow of inputs for Mexico's trade-exposed, manufacturing-heavy economy. Shifts in U.S. demand, global prices, and the peso often show up first in trade, then filter into GDP and consumption. Because official series arrive with delays and revisions, model-based nowcasts provide an early, probabilistic read for policy timing — useful if treated with uncertainty bands and cross-checked against higher-frequency signals.

A Dynamic Factor Model (DFM) nowcasts quarterly GDP and its demand components — private consumption, imports, and exports — using 14 higher-frequency inputs. These include monthly employment indicators, industrial production (IGAE), consumer confidence, capacity utilization, retail sales, and private consumption, plus quarterly GDP sector breakdowns. The model extracts common factors via the Kalman filter, updating the nowcast each time any input series receives new data. Nowcast estimates are conditional expectations that narrow as more data arrive within each quarter.

Out-of-sample backtest over 12 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). Out-of-sample backtest over 12 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. Real GDP (RMSE 3.90 vs 3.82 naive, n=12); Private Consumption (RMSE 5.41 vs 2.51 naive, n=12); Exports (RMSE 22.26 vs 18.28 naive, n=12); Imports (RMSE 11.34 vs 17.09 naive, +34% improvement, n=12).

Labor Market Update: Resilient Unemployment Rates Amid Rising Informality

Updated: 2026-07-03 by Alexander Dentler

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • The latest ENOE survey for January 2026 reveals a notable resilience in the Mexican labor market as the unemployment rate remains at 2.51%, reflecting a low percentile historically.
  • By gender, the unemployment landscape presents a nuanced picture, with male unemployment at 3.35%, significantly higher than female unemployment at 3.51%.
  • The share of informal workers remains elevated, signaling persistent structural issues in the labor market.
CommentaryMethodologyPerformanceBackground

The latest ENOE survey for January 2026 reveals a notable resilience in the Mexican labor market as the unemployment rate remains at 2.51%, reflecting a low percentile historically. The January 2026 ENOE survey shows unemployment at 2.51%, which is around the 1st percentile of its historical range. This figure represents a decline of -0.0158% compared to December 2025, continuing a downward trend observed over the past year, where it has decreased by -0.22%. Such persistently low unemployment rates might suggest a tightening labor market, which could have implications for wage pressures and consumer spending.

By gender, the unemployment landscape presents a nuanced picture, with male unemployment at 3.35%, significantly higher than female unemployment at 3.51%. Male and female unemployment rates show a divergence, with males registering at 3.35%—around the 86th percentile—while females are at 3.51%, around the 14th percentile. This disparity highlights the ongoing challenges faced by male workers in securing employment relative to their female counterparts, suggesting potential sectoral or demographic influences at play.

The share of informal workers remains elevated, signaling persistent structural issues in the labor market. Informal employment in January 2026 stands at 55.7%, which is around the 96th percentile of its historical range. This marks an increase of 0.132% from the previous month, indicating a rising trend in informality. The prevalence of informal employment often points to underlying economic vulnerabilities and may complicate efforts to achieve sustainable growth and improve job quality.

DFM Employment Nowcasts

Indicator Last Obs. (Q2 2026) Nowcast (Q2 2026) Prev. Nowcast Revision
Unemployment Rate 2.56% 2.51%
Underemployment Rate 10.28% 12.17%
Male Unemployment 2.45% 3.35%
Female Unemployment 2.71% 3.51%

Observed = latest quarterly ENOE value. Nowcast = DFM filtered estimate using monthly auxiliary data. "Revision" = change from previous run.

Labor slack and its composition shape inflation pressure, policy timing, and social risk. Unemployment, underemployment, and unemployment by gender reveal how broad and uneven slack is. In Mexico's large informal sector, the informal employment share can swing sharply — often contracting faster in downturns as unprotected jobs are cut first, then rebounding early — masking true slack if headline unemployment alone is tracked. Tracking these dimensions helps distinguish cyclical slack from structural mismatches and calibrate monetary policy accordingly.

Between quarterly ENOE survey releases, a Dynamic Factor Model (DFM) nowcasts employment indicators using higher-frequency auxiliary data. The model ingests monthly series — industrial production, consumer confidence, capacity utilization, retail sales, and private consumption — alongside quarterly GDP components to extract common factors that track the business cycle. When any auxiliary series receives new data, the Kalman filter updates the nowcast, providing an early signal before the next official employment release.

Out-of-sample backtest over 20 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). Out-of-sample backtest over 20 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. Unemployment (RMSE 22.27 vs 0.13 naive, n=17); Underemployment (RMSE 1.26 vs 0.50 naive, n=11); Male Unemployment (RMSE 0.44 vs 0.26 naive, n=11); Female Unemployment (RMSE 0.44 vs 0.28 naive, n=11).

INEGI's Q2 2026 Productivity Data: Secondary Sector Stays Robust Amid Volatility

Updated: 2026-06-12 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • INEGI's Q2 2026 productivity release shows secondary sector output at 102, reflecting a solid 2.13% increase from the previous month.
  • Manufacturing composites show a mixed bag of trends, highlighting sustainability concerns.
  • Within manufacturing, construction shines while the chemical industry struggles.
CommentaryMethodologyBackground

INEGI's Q2 2026 productivity release shows secondary sector output at 102, reflecting a solid 2.13% increase from the previous month. The latest INEGI productivity data for Q2 2026, released on June 12, reveals that secondary sector output is holding strong, driven by notable gains in construction and manufacturing. This growth is broad-based, with the construction sector leading the charge, signaling resilience against inflationary pressures. Meanwhile, mining lags behind, indicating potential instability in that subsector.

Manufacturing composites show a mixed bag of trends, highlighting sustainability concerns. Across the PCA indices, productivity dipped slightly while sales and inventory dynamics suggest a tightening labor market. The divergence in labor demand—currently at a low of -1.49—raises red flags about future growth potential, especially as rising inventory levels could indicate overproduction risks.

Within manufacturing, construction shines while the chemical industry struggles. The top-performing subsectors include construction, which is at the 99th percentile, showing a whopping 7.76% increase, while the chemical industry underperforms in the 21st percentile, down 7.74%. The robust construction output significantly bolsters the overall manufacturing index, but the decline in chemicals underscores the volatility and challenges facing specific industries.

PCA Composite Indices

Index May 2025 Jun 2025 Δ
Productivity Index 0.50 0.28 -0.22
Sales Index 0.58 0.61 +0.03
Inventory Index 0.15 -0.03 -0.18
Labor Demand Index -1.32 -1.49 -0.17

Standardized scores (0 = mean, ±1 = one standard deviation).

Productivity trends reveal the economy's capacity to grow without stoking inflation. In Mexico, productivity in the secondary sector — mining, energy, construction, and especially manufacturing — signals how efficiently output expands relative to inputs. Strong productivity gains mean firms can meet demand without raising prices, easing inflation pressure and supporting sustainable wage growth. Weak productivity, by contrast, constrains supply, making cost shocks more inflationary. Manufacturing deserves closer scrutiny, as its diverse subsectors respond differently to global demand, exchange rate shifts, and investment cycles. Tracking these patterns helps judge whether growth is supported by efficiency gains or reliant on credit and labor cost increases.

Four composite indices — productivity, sales, inventory, and labor demand — are constructed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) applied to INEGI manufacturing subsector data and GDP sector composition. PCA extracts the dominant co-movement pattern across subsectors, producing standardized indices that summarize broad trends while filtering out subsector-specific noise. The productivity index draws on output-per-worker measures across manufacturing branches; the sales, inventory, and labor demand indices use INEGI's corresponding survey-based indicators supplemented by GDP sector weights.

INEGI's June 2026 Consumer Confidence Survey: A Complex Landscape

Updated: 2026-07-03 by Alexander Dentler

View static chart (PNG)

CommentaryMethodologyBackground

The June 2026 consumer confidence survey shows the general index at 1.12, reflecting elevated sentiment at the 85th percentile. INEGI's latest June 2026 release reveals confidence at 1.12, reflecting elevated sentiment at the 85th percentile. This index rose by 0.11 compared to May, indicating a positive shift in consumer attitudes. However, the durable goods index at 1.72 suggests particularly strong confidence in this area, contrasting with the housing-specific index, which has dropped to 0.10. This divergence may reflect consumers' prioritization of immediate purchases over long-term investments amid ongoing economic uncertainties.

PCA Confidence Indices

Index May 2026 Jun 2026 Δ
General Sentiment 1.01 1.12 +0.11
Housing Appetite 0.34 0.10 -0.24
Durables Appetite 1.29 1.72 +0.43

Values are z-scores (0 = historical mean, ±1 = one standard deviation).

The ENCO (Encuesta Nacional sobre Confianza del Consumidor) is conducted jointly by INEGI and Banco de México. Roughly 2,300 households across 32 major cities are interviewed during the first 20 days of each reference month, and results are published around the 5th of the following month. The survey uses a rotating panel design — each household stays in sample for four consecutive months, rests for eight, then returns for four more — which smooths out idiosyncratic response noise while capturing genuine shifts in sentiment. Because confidence data arrive before most hard activity indicators for the same month, they provide an early read on whether household demand is strengthening or cooling.

Three composite confidence indices — general sentiment, housing appetite, and durables appetite — are extracted from the eight raw INEGI survey questions using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). PCA identifies the common variation within each question group, producing a single index that captures the dominant signal while filtering out question-specific noise. The general index draws on six broad economic outlook questions; the housing and durables indices each isolate spending appetite in categories most sensitive to interest rates and household balance sheets.

COMING SOON...

Banxico's SPF Update: Aggregate Concerns Diminish, Yet Insecurities Linger

Updated: 2026-07-02 by Alexander Dentler

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • The June 2026 SPF survey reveals a modest decline in economic concerns.
  • The latest survey highlights significant constraints on growth, particularly in public security and trade policy.
  • Recession concerns remain moderate, reflecting a cautious outlook among economists.
  • Expectations regarding the peso's valuation indicate a prevailing sense of overvaluation among forecasters.
CommentaryBackground

The June 2026 SPF survey reveals a modest decline in economic concerns. The June 2026 SPF survey shows the aggregate Concern Index at 2.83, placing it around the 63rd percentile. This marks a decrease of -0.13 from the previous month, suggesting a slight easing in overall economic anxieties. Nonetheless, the index has experienced a downward trend over the past two months, indicating persistent underlying concerns among economic observers.

The latest survey highlights significant constraints on growth, particularly in public security and trade policy. Economists have identified public insecurity as the top constraint, currently accounting for 9.2% of concerns, followed closely by US trade policy at 8.2%. Notably, public insecurity has decreased by -0.46 from the previous month, while US trade policy has seen a substantial increase of +1.80, underscoring its growing impact on economic sentiment.

Recession concerns remain moderate, reflecting a cautious outlook among economists. The perceived probability of recession stands at 10.0%, which is moderate compared to historical norms. This indicates a stable sentiment among surveyed economists when juxtaposed with the previous quarter, suggesting that while fears exist, they are not at alarming levels. The outlook for the next quarter is slightly more pronounced at 15.0%, indicating a potential uptick in recession fears.

Expectations regarding the peso's valuation indicate a prevailing sense of overvaluation among forecasters. According to forecasters, the current FX forecast misalignment reflects a perceived overvaluation of the peso, with a deviation of +0.058. This sentiment is consistent across multiple horizons, as forecasters anticipate a similar pattern in the following months, suggesting a sustained outlook of a weaker peso than expected.

Banxico's Survey of Professional Forecasters (Encuesta sobre las Expectativas de los Especialistas en Economía del Sector Privado) polls roughly 40 groups of analysts from banks, financial institutions, consultancies, and research centers. Responses are collected during the second half of each reference month — typically between the 15th and 28th — and results are published on the first business day of the following month. Because respondents form their expectations before some end-of-month official data releases, the survey provides an early window into shifting professional sentiment on inflation, growth constraints, recession risk, and exchange rates, making it a valuable leading indicator for policymakers and market participants.

Mexican Markets Brace for Rate Hold Amid Rising Tensions

Updated: 2026-07-04 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Mexican equity markets as of July 4, 2026, show excess returns at -0.2169, reflecting a cautious market as volatility hangs in the air.
  • The decomposition shows volatility is being driven primarily by US policy shocks and liquidity issues, which have had a pronounced impact on investor sentiment.
  • Investor sentiment is increasingly alarmed, reflected in elevated levels of policy uncertainty and market anxiety.
CommentaryMethodologyBackground

Mexican equity markets as of July 4, 2026, show excess returns at -0.2169, reflecting a cautious market as volatility hangs in the air. With data through July 4, 2026, realized volatility sits at 0.0122, indicating a slight uptick in uncertainty. The recent revisions in illiquidity metrics have raised eyebrows, with the Amihud index now at 147.1455, signaling a tightening in market conditions. We've seen a notable shift in sentiment, with excess returns sharply declining and pointing to investor wariness as geopolitical concerns loom larger.

The decomposition shows volatility is being driven primarily by US policy shocks and liquidity issues, which have had a pronounced impact on investor sentiment. These factors have contributed to a negative excess return environment, with recent spikes in volatility highlighting the fragility of market confidence. Particularly, the influence of real-sector difficulties cannot be overlooked, as they continue to weigh on the outlook.

Investor sentiment is increasingly alarmed, reflected in elevated levels of policy uncertainty and market anxiety. The AAII sentiment index has shown a marked increase in bearish sentiment, while economic policy uncertainty levels remain high, suggesting that investors are bracing for turbulent times ahead. The confluence of public security concerns and economic policy uncertainty is creating a perfect storm for market participants, leading to a more cautious approach.

Volatility Measures

Measure Jun 2026 Jul 2026 Δ Top Driver
Excess Return -0.1336 0.0217 +0.1553 US Policy Shocks (+0.127)
Realized Volatility 0.0094 0.0074 -0.0021 Liquidity and Financing (+0.001)
Illiquidity (Amihud) 99.0727 37.0357 -62.0369 Real-Sector Difficulties (-14.059)

Monthly averages. Top Driver = largest OLS category contribution to latest value.

Financial market returns, volatility, and liquidity signal investor sentiment and risk appetite. Excess returns over government bonds capture the risk premium investors demand for holding equities; wider spreads suggest higher perceived risk or stronger growth prospects. Realized volatility in a stock market index reflects uncertainty — sharp swings indicate fragile sentiment and raise the cost of capital. Illiquidity shows how trading volume and price impact interact: when liquidity dries up, small trades can move prices disproportionately, amplifying shocks. For monetary policy, these indicators matter because they shape funding costs, investment flows, and the broader transmission of rate decisions into financial conditions.

Volatility drivers are analyzed in two steps. First, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) groups the six SPF concern categories and investor sentiment indicators (AAII bull-bear spread, NAAIM exposure index) into thematic driver clusters that capture common variation. Second, an OLS regression decomposes recent volatility movements into contributions from each driver cluster, quantifying how much of the observed excess return and realized volatility is attributable to policy uncertainty, external sentiment, and domestic macro conditions. The decomposition is descriptive — it identifies contemporaneous associations, not causal effects.

Banxico's Latest Credit Data Signals Tightening Conditions Ahead

Updated: 2026-07-04 by María López

View static chart (PNG)

Key Takeaways

  • Banxico's July 2026 credit release shows money market spreads tightening, reflecting caution in the lending landscape.
  • Household mortgage rates are climbing, putting pressure on affordability.
  • Debt issuance patterns show a clear preference for fixed-rate financing, signaling a strategic shift.
CommentaryBackground

Banxico's July 2026 credit release shows money market spreads tightening, reflecting caution in the lending landscape. Following the latest July lending data, rate premia are settling at 0.21% against the policy rate, which suggests a narrowing trend. The spread has tightened by 0.042% over the past month, indicating a more cautious approach among financial institutions. As markets grapple with geopolitical tensions and energy price hikes, this tightening could signal a more selective lending environment, impacting borrowers' access to credit.

Household mortgage rates are climbing, putting pressure on affordability. The total annual cost of mortgages (CAT) averages 14.0%, spanning a range from 10.7% to a steep 28.2%. With the policy rate likely to hold steady, the pass-through effect means consumers face higher borrowing costs, which could dampen demand in the housing sector. This situation raises concerns about home affordability at a time when security and economic stability are already under threat.

Debt issuance patterns show a clear preference for fixed-rate financing, signaling a strategic shift. Corporate financing is leaning heavily toward fixed-rate debt, which now accounts for 19.47% of GDP, while variable rates lag behind. This shift suggests firms are bracing for potential rate hikes, opting for stability amidst an uncertain economic climate. As companies adapt their financing strategies, the lack of new issuance could stifle growth and investment, raising alarms for future economic prospects.

Rate premia show how market and bank funding costs move relative to the policy rate, indicating the efficiency of monetary transmission. Household mortgage rates capture the cost of long-term borrowing — their sharp rise in recent years signals affordability pressures and distributional effects, as many families face double-digit costs. Debt issuance patterns, normalized by GDP, reveal how firms finance themselves; the balance between fixed and variable rates matters for vulnerability to policy shifts. Together, these indicators show how policy rates filter into real borrowing conditions, affecting credit demand, investment, and ultimately growth and inflation dynamics.