Stay informed with the latest insights on Mexico's economy via statistics and AI analysis and synthesis.
Updated: 2026-02-05
President Trump stated that his candidate for the Federal Reserve understands the necessity of lowering interest rates. He emphasized the importance of this approach in addressing economic challenges. The comments reflect Trump's ongoing influence over monetary policy discussions. — El Economista, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Citi reports that Banco de México will pause its cycle of interest rate cuts and is expected to resume this process in May. The decision reflects the current economic conditions and the bank's strategy under the leadership of Governor Victoria Rodríguez Ceja. — El Economista, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
The Mexican stock market experienced a significant decline following its best performance since April. Cemex was noted as the leading contributor to the losses, impacting overall market sentiment. — El Economista, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexican banks achieved a profit growth of 1.10% in 2025, marking a new historical record. This increase highlights the resilience and profitability of the banking sector in the country during this period. — El Economista, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
The Mexican peso closed at 17.32 units against the US dollar, reflecting a decline as the dollar shows signs of recovery. This movement in the exchange rate highlights ongoing fluctuations in currency values, influenced by various economic factors. — El Financiero, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Banco Nacional de Comercio Exterior (Bancomext) is implementing a new strategy to enhance its support for Mexican exporters. The bank aims to increase financing options and improve access to international markets. President Claudia Sheinbaum emphasized the importance of this initiative for boosting the country's economic growth and competitiveness. — Expansión, 31 Jan 2026. Read more
The article discusses recent meetings among central banks, highlighting the strategies of Banxico under Governor Victoria Rodríguez Ceja and the Federal Reserve led by Jerome Powell. Both institutions are navigating complex economic conditions as they assess their monetary policies. The article emphasizes the importance of collaboration and communication between these central banks to address global economic challenges. — Expansión, 31 Jan 2026. Read more
Wall Street ended the trading session in negative territory following the nomination of Kevin Warsh to the Federal Reserve. The Mexican Stock Exchange (BMV) also experienced a decline, falling by 2.80%. Investors reacted to the news, reflecting concerns over potential shifts in monetary policy. — El Financiero, 30 Jan 2026. Read more
The Banco Central de Colombia has increased its interest rates by 100 basis points, bringing the total to 10.25%. This decision reflects the bank's ongoing efforts to manage economic conditions and inflation. The move is part of a broader strategy to stabilize the financial environment in Colombia. — El Economista, 30 Jan 2026. Read more
The Mexican peso experienced a slight decline against the US dollar, although it is expected to close the month on a solid note. The article highlights the resilience of the peso amid ongoing economic conditions and market dynamics. — El Economista, 30 Jan 2026. Read more
Remittances to Mexico fall by $3 billion; things won’t get better in 2026, experts warn — Google News, 05 Feb 2026. Read more
PEMEX Doubles Daily Refinery Output / Epstein Case Reaches Mexico — Google News, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
US, Mexico to develop coordinated trade policies on critical minerals — Google News, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico Remittances Fall After 11-Year Growth Streak — Google News, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Remittances to Mexico drop for the first time in 11 years — Google News, 04 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico's Ambitious $323 Billion Infrastructure Plan: A New Path to Economic Growth — Google News, 03 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico Unveils Energy-Focused Investment Plan to Juice Economy — Google News, 03 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico will ‘cease’ sending oil to Cuba, says Trump — Google News, 03 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico’s Exports Reach US$664.8 Billion Amid 0.39% GDP Growth — Google News, 03 Feb 2026. Read more
Mexico finance minister estimates national economic growth of between 2.5% and 3% in 2026 — Google News, 03 Feb 2026. Read more
Updated: 2026-01-19
Key Takeaways
Following the December 18, 2025 monetary policy decision, Banxico's policy rate stands at 7.00%, a delicate equilibrium achieved after a series of twelve consecutive cuts totaling an audacious 4.00 percentage points since August 2024. In this era of reduction, Banxico has artfully performed a pirouette away from tightening, yet the echoes of structural deficiencies linger ominously in the background, casting a pall over the otherwise serene stage. Economists remain focused on the rule of law and security issues, with mentions rising by 3.2% month-over-month, signaling heightened attention to risks that could undermine the very foundation of this monetary choreography.
Relative to the United States, the Fed's target rate currently hovers at 3.62%, creating a notable rate differential of 3.38 percentage points in favor of Mexico. While both central banks have recently embarked on a synchronized path of rate cuts, Banxico has taken the first step, showcasing its proactive stance in the face of external economic pressures. This first-mover advantage, however, may soon be tested as the Fed prepares to convene in just twelve days, potentially altering the delicate balance of influence between these two monetary titans.
The rate differential, while ostensibly advantageous, could engender complex ramifications for capital flows and foreign exchange stability. For markets, this substantial spread may entice foreign investment, yet it simultaneously raises the specter of currency pressure should investor sentiment waver amidst rising concerns about Mexico's rule of law and security. Thus, Banxico finds itself in a precarious position, where the allure of lower rates must be weighed against the realities of economic fragility and investor confidence.
The central bank's policy rate is the primary tool for steering inflation and economic activity. Banxico targets 3% annual inflation and adjusts its overnight interbank rate to influence borrowing costs throughout the economy. The rate differential with the United States affects capital flows and exchange rate dynamics — a wider spread can attract foreign investment but may constrain domestic credit. Policy decisions are announced roughly every six weeks following scheduled monetary policy meetings.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
With fresh insights from the latest economic indicators influencing policy decisions, Banxico faces a pivotal choice today. Following updates to the yield curve and FX indicators, our model-based expectations suggest a substantial chance of no action at today’s meeting, with a hold probability hovering around 58%. The expected mean change in policy rates stands at -11 basis points as we approach the target MPD date of February 5, 2026. This represents a slight shift from our previous model outputs, where the probability of holding rates was less pronounced. The modal bucket indicates a hold, while the next most likely scenario—an interest rate cut—carries a probability of about 39%.
Recent data updates have provided critical insights that may influence Banxico's deliberations. In the wake of the latest economic developments, key indicators such as inflation and bond yields have remained stable since our last assessment. This stability underscores a cautious approach among policymakers amid ongoing uncertainties in the global economic landscape.
As we dissect the influential drivers shaping today's policy decision, a clearer picture emerges. The current economic landscape presents moderate dovish pressure, primarily driven by stable bond yields and a relatively stable exchange rate, while inflation figures suggest negligible upward momentum. Notably, the economic policy uncertainty surrounding the Fed's decisions remains a significant concern, looming over Banxico’s considerations. Ultimately, while these drivers inform our model, the actual decision will hinge on the committee's broader judgment and the evolving economic context.
When markets and the public can anticipate how and why the central bank acts, uncertainty falls and policy becomes more effective. Clear communication helps businesses plan investments, households make borrowing decisions, and international investors gauge currency risks. Economists often stress the importance of clarity and traceability — the ability to follow and understand decisions step by step. Without it, rate moves risk being misread, causing volatility instead of stability. With it, policy signals are more credible, anchoring expectations and strengthening the central bank's influence.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
Bond prices as of 2026-02-05 reveal the 10Y-3Y spread at 1.29 percentage points, reflecting a notable increase of 10 basis points from the previous observation. The latest data on bond yields signals a complex interplay between investor sentiment and monetary policy expectations. The nominal spread's upward movement, coupled with an ongoing inversion in the implied inflation spread, paints a picture of a market that is both vigilant and responsive to shifts in the economic landscape. With the real spread hovering in normal territory, it suggests that while growth may be expected, inflation concerns are still present but perhaps less pressing than before.
The curve shape suggests a leaning towards easing as markets price in a 55% probability of a rate cut from Banxico, driven by economic policy uncertainty and moderating inflation. In this environment, the bond market is likely to react sensitively to any signs of changes in monetary policy, particularly as the central bank navigates between fostering growth and controlling inflation. The current yield curve dynamics suggest that market participants are preparing for a potential pivot in policy direction, an indication that all eyes will be on the upcoming meetings as the economic landscape continues to evolve.
When investors and businesses trust that monetary policy will remain credible and predictable, long-term interest rates respond more smoothly to central bank signals. Yield curve spreads between long and short maturities serve as a real-time gauge of this alignment: a stable, upward-sloping curve suggests markets expect gradual normalization, while persistent inversions often signal that markets anticipate policy shifts before they are announced. For Mexico, where inflation targeting depends on anchoring expectations across a diverse investor base, the 10-year minus 3-year spread offers a compact summary of whether policy communication is landing as intended.
So…what is this—and why am I doing it?
This project began with a simple question in 2021: how much of the work of producing useful economic information can we hand over to machines? Monitoring Monetary Policy in Mexico is a thought experiment at that frontier. By combining statistical analysis, tailored visualizations, and large language models, it demonstrates how even highly specialized topics—such as Mexican monetary policy—can be made more accessible, relevant, and insightful. Meanwhile, the system is designed to run without human intervention on a daily basis. My role is to set the design; the automation carries it out.
When does data stop being a dump and start being a story?
The initiative builds on my earlier Monitoring Mexico project but has since evolved in important ways. Data is no longer simply displayed; it is analyzed, distilled, forecasted, visualized, interpreted, narrated, and contextualized. Large language models help transform both raw and modeled data into context, turning numbers into stories. In short, raw information is transformed into understanding.
Who’s in charge here—a Raspberry Pi or common sense?
Behind the scenes, the site runs on a Raspberry Pi 5 powered by Python and a library of custom routines. Automation drives much of the process, but human expertise remains essential in designing the explanation and presenting the material. The balance between machine efficiency and human judgment is what makes the project work.
How do we cut through the jargon and keep the signal?
The aim is straightforward: to bring clarity to an area often obscured by technical detail. Monetary policy shapes households, firms, and markets, yet its analysis usually remains confined to experts. By filtering, explaining, and visualizing the data, this project seeks to make that knowledge more transparent and more useful.
Is this the 80/20 rule you learn in business school in the wild?
At its core, the site is both a contribution to public understanding and an exploration of how informational value is created. It is a humble attempt to deliver 80% of the insights of a central bank analysis with 20% of the resources—while also testing what the future of knowledge generation might look like.
What might be new the next time you drop by?
This is very much a work in progress, with new features, analyses, and visualizations added over time. We can now at the brink of generating our very own economic policy uncertainty (EPU) index, and we consider a newsletter. But maybe a chatbot might be more appropriate? Coming back to check for updates is always a good idea. If the site sparks curiosity, fosters dialogue, or simply helps illuminate Mexico’s economic dynamics, it has achieved its goal.
Updated: 2026-01-30 by M.L.
Key Takeaways
The mid-January 2026 CPI release shows headline inflation at 3.74%, comfortably nestled within Banxico's target band. The mid-January 2026 CPI release shows headline inflation at 3.74%, sitting at the 36th percentile and remaining well within Banxico's target band of 3% ± 1pp. This marks a modest increase of 0.10 percentage points from the previous month, reflecting a controlled rise in consumer prices. While the current level is stable, the slight uptick indicates that price pressures, although manageable, are still present in the economy. This situation underscores the importance of vigilance as the central bank navigates its monetary policy landscape in a post-pandemic recovery phase.
Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, tells a different story with greater intensity. Core inflation, which excludes volatile components, registered at 4.50%, significantly higher than headline inflation and positioned at the 76th percentile. This indicates a divergence as core inflation has risen by 0.10 percentage points from the prior month, suggesting that underlying inflationary pressures are becoming more pronounced. The widening gap from the target, now 1.5 percentage points above the 3% mark, raises concerns about persistent inflationary trends in essential goods and services. The central bank's task of anchoring expectations becomes increasingly critical as it contemplates future policy adjustments.
Trade prices reveal a mixed picture, with export prices climbing significantly, while import prices remain stable. Trade prices have shown notable movement, particularly in export indices, which surged to 7.05%, reflecting an increase of 1.15 percentage points compared to the prior month. This marked uptick in export prices signals robust demand dynamics in external markets, potentially leading to increased revenue for key sectors. In contrast, import prices have remained relatively stable at 2.30%, indicating that while domestic inflation pressures are less pronounced on imported goods, they are not entirely absent. The interplay between these trade price movements could have significant implications for the broader inflation landscape and monetary policy, especially as the central bank weighs its response to these differing signals.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) measures changes in the cost of a representative basket of goods and services purchased by Mexican households. Banxico targets 3% annual inflation with a ±1 percentage point tolerance band. Core CPI — which excludes volatile food and energy prices — reveals underlying inflation trends that guide monetary policy. Import and export price indices extend the picture by linking Mexico's inflation dynamics to global markets, trade flows, and currency movements.
Updated: 2026-02-04 by Pablo Rivas
Key Takeaways
The latest SHF House Price Index shows house price inflation at 8.86% YoY as of July 2025, reflecting a slight uptick in a landscape of growing economic concerns. This recent figure, observed in July 2025, indicates that house price inflation is above its historical average, sitting in the 79th percentile since 2006. In contrast, headline CPI inflation is at 3.69%, while the housing CPI subcategory lingers lower at 3.35%. This creates a notable house price premium, standing 5.17 percentage points above overall CPI and 5.51 points above housing-specific inflation. However, there’s a bit of a disconnect here, as the current DFM nowcast suggests a downward trend in price momentum, hinting at a potential softening ahead.
The DFM nowcast, pegged at 7.14% YoY as of January 2026, reveals a gap with the observed inflation, indicating underlying pressures that might not bode well for future price growth. With the nowcast trailing the observed rate by 1.72 percentage points, it signals that auxiliary indicators like mortgage lending and housing CPI are exerting downward pressure on house prices. This divergence suggests a cooling in the housing market, contrary to the recent upward trends we've been seeing. It’s a classic case of the model catching whispers of a potential headwind, urging caution as we look down the road.
Housing is a major household asset and a key store of wealth. Rising prices can lift balance sheets and collateral values, while falling prices can weaken credit conditions and confidence. Housing costs also shape the cost of living and affordability, making house price inflation relevant for both growth and distributional pressures in Mexico.
Updated: 2026-01-23
Key Takeaways
Brent oil prices through December 2025 reveal a disconcerting tale, settling at $61.81, a staggering 15.6% decline year-over-year. Brent oil prices through December 2025 reveal a disconcerting tale, settling at $61.81, a staggering 15.6% decline year-over-year. This downward trajectory, exacerbated by global supply chain disruptions and fluctuating demand, has cast a pall over Mexico's federal revenues, which hinge significantly on oil exports. With a three-day streak of decline, the implications for Pemex and the Campeche regional economy are as clear as a foggy morning: uncertainty looms large.
Copper, on the other hand, shines like a beacon, currently priced at $11,790.96 and boasting a robust 32.3% increase over the past year. Copper, on the other hand, shines like a beacon, currently priced at $11,790.96 and boasting a robust 32.3% increase over the past year. This metal's recent upward momentum—evident in a 9.1% monthly increase—reflects a burgeoning demand from the tech sector and a resurgence in global infrastructure projects. For Mexico's mining sector, particularly in Sonora, this trend offers a silver lining amidst the otherwise turbulent commodity seas.
Corn prices are on a modest ascent, currently at $205.32, with a year-over-year rise of 1.2%. Corn prices are on a modest ascent, currently at $205.32, with a year-over-year rise of 1.2%. This gentle rise, marked by a 1.8% increase in the last month, paints a picture of stability in an otherwise volatile agricultural landscape. For Mexico's 1.5 million smallholder farmers, this incremental growth brings hope, but the specter of food price inflation still lurks in the shadows.
Commodity prices feed directly into Mexico's inflation pulse and terms of trade. Oil and corn affect energy and food costs, while copper is a proxy for global industrial demand. For policymakers, sharp commodity swings can shift inflation expectations and fiscal balances, making these prices critical to monitor.
Updated: 2026-01-19
Key Takeaways
The December 2025 IMSS release shows unit labor costs at 3.89%, reflecting a rise in wages outpacing productivity. Following December's formal sector wage data, ULC in manufacturing is climbing, indicating that wages are growing faster than productivity. This latest figure is in the 80th percentile and marks a month-over-month decline of 1.01 percentage points. It suggests that businesses might face cost-push inflation pressures, which could squeeze profit margins and affect competitiveness down the line.
Real wages in the formal sector continue to show positive growth, signaling improved purchasing power for workers. Manufacturing real wages are currently up by 3.29%, while retail real wages are slightly higher at 3.77%. Even though both sectors are experiencing gains, the decline in growth rates compared to previous months indicates that households may be feeling a pinch, as the overall growth is slowing. However, the fact that purchasing power is still on the rise is a silver lining for households navigating through economic uncertainties.
Across sectors, manufacturing and retail diverge in their labor cost dynamics, with manufacturing showing stronger wage growth. Manufacturing is currently outperforming retail in terms of unit labor costs, which are rising faster than those in the retail sector. This divergence suggests that while consumers in retail may be enjoying a bit of wage growth, manufacturers are grappling with heightened labor costs that could impact their pricing strategies. Retail, on the other hand, is lagging behind, with ULC growth remaining more subdued at 3.56%.
Unit labor costs (ULC) measure the average cost of labor per unit of output — when wages grow faster than productivity, ULC rises, potentially squeezing profit margins and fueling inflation. In Mexico, where the formal sector employs roughly half the workforce, IMSS-registered wage data captures trends in the formal economy but misses the informal sector's dynamics. Real wages — nominal wages adjusted for inflation — determine household purchasing power and underpin consumer demand. For policymakers, these indicators help balance inflation control, competitiveness, and the economic welfare of Mexican workers.
Updated: 2026-01-19
Key Takeaways
Following the latest quarterly GDP release from INEGI, real GDP growth in Mexico remains stable at 2.31%, with no change from the previous estimate. The nowcast estimate, updated with the most recent data, shows that the Mexican economy is holding steady for the moment. This stability comes at a time when global markets are feeling the pressure, especially with Wall Street showing signs of unease as investors brace for potential interest rate moves in the U.S. Notably, this economic backdrop is crucial for understanding the conditions under which Mexican growth is playing out.
Private consumption continues to be a bright spot in the economic landscape. With a growth rate of 2.85%, household spending is supporting overall activity, helping to buffer against external headwinds. This steady demand from consumers is vital, especially as the economy navigates a more cautious global trading environment.
Exports are showing a healthy growth rate of 5.21%, reflecting resilient external demand. This figure indicates that despite the broader concerns in the U.S. economy, Mexican goods are still finding their way to international markets. As traders keep an eye on U.S. economic indicators, these export figures signal a continued appetite for Mexican manufacturing, primarily from our biggest trading partner.
Imports are also on the rise, currently at 5.37%, indicating robust domestic demand. This uptick suggests that Mexican consumers and businesses are actively seeking foreign goods, which can be a double-edged sword. While it reflects a strong appetite for consumption and investment, it also raises concerns about the trade balance in the longer term, especially if external conditions shift.
Net trade dynamics remain challenging to assess without precise figures, but the growth in imports compared to exports may hint at pressure on the trade balance. As we look forward, the interplay between these external and internal demands will be key in shaping the economic narrative for Mexico. With the global economy on shaky ground, the balance between exports and imports will be under close scrutiny.
Real activity data tracks the economy's engine — output, spending, and trade — while nowcasts bridge the lag between releases. Real GDP captures total production; private consumption reflects household demand; exports and imports reveal external demand and the flow of inputs for Mexico's trade-exposed, manufacturing-heavy economy. Shifts in U.S. demand, global prices, and the peso often show up first in trade, then filter into GDP and consumption. Because official series arrive with delays and revisions, model-based nowcasts provide an early, probabilistic read for policy timing — useful if treated with uncertainty bands and cross-checked against higher-frequency signals.
Updated: 2026-01-16
Key Takeaways
The December 2025 ENOE survey shows unemployment at 3.28%, nudging up slightly from the previous month. The December 2025 ENOE survey shows unemployment at 3.28%, which is about the 33rd percentile historically. This marks a modest increase of 0.025 from November, continuing an upward trend observed over the last two months, with a total rise of 0.106. These developments come amid a rising tide of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, as highlighted by Wall Street's recent dips in response to concerns over inflation and potential rate adjustments from the Fed.
By gender, unemployment rates reveal a notable consistency, though slightly higher for women. Male and female unemployment rates are at 3.37% and 3.55%, respectively, both reflecting no change from the previous month. Despite this stability, the fact that women's unemployment remains marginally higher suggests a potential area of concern as the labor market navigates these uncertain waters.
Informal employment continues its downward trend, signaling a shift in the labor landscape. The share of informal workers stands at 27.8%, having fallen by 0.0258 from the previous month. This 6-month streak of decline, which totals a reduction of 0.295, could indicate a gradual formalization of the labor market, albeit amidst the broader economic challenges.
Unemployment spells are lengthening slightly, hinting at lingering difficulties for job seekers. The average duration of unemployment now sits at 1.87 months, showing an increase of 0.161 from the last quarter. This uptick, while not alarming, suggests that those out of work are finding it increasingly challenging to secure new positions, contributing to a sense of prolonged difficulty in the market.
Among the unemployed, educational attainment is shifting, reflecting a worrying trend. The educational mix of job seekers shows an increase in the proportion of those with no education, now at 3.51%. This rise, although modest, highlights potential vulnerabilities in the labor market, particularly as the job landscape evolves and requires more skilled workers.
Labor slack and its composition shape inflation pressure, policy timing, and social risk. Unemployment, underemployment, and unemployment by gender reveal how broad and uneven slack is; longer unemployment durations and weaker prospects for the more-educated raise scarring risks and damp wage growth. In Mexico's large informal sector, the informal employment share can swing sharply — often contracting faster in downturns as unprotected jobs are cut first, then rebounding early — masking true slack if headline unemployment alone is tracked. Tracking these dimensions helps distinguish cyclical slack from structural mismatches and calibrate monetary policy accordingly.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
INEGI's Q4 2025 productivity release shows secondary sector output at 101, reflecting a modest upward trend, yet presents a complex landscape of performance across its subsectors. The latest INEGI productivity data for Q4 2025, released in February 2026, indicates that secondary sector productivity stands at 101, signaling a 0.578 increase from the previous month. This growth, however, is not universally felt; while sectors like construction have surged, buoyed by a robust upward streak, the mining sector remains mired in a dismal 10th percentile, reflecting broader economic challenges. The divergence in performance suggests that while some areas are thriving, others are struggling—an indication that the gains in productivity may not be as resilient as they seem.
Manufacturing composites reveal a troubling divergence between productivity and labor demand. Across the PCA indices, manufacturing composites show a worrying trend: while productivity has stabilized at 0.281, sales have outpaced it with a recent uptick, revealing a delicate balance that raises sustainability concerns. Labor demand, however, has fallen sharply to -1.49, indicating that despite higher sales, the industry is not translating this into hiring or investment—an ominous sign for future growth.
Within manufacturing, construction stands out as a beacon of strength, while transport equipment falters. The top-performing subsectors within manufacturing include construction, which boasts a productivity index of 105, reflecting a 2-month upward streak, and food production, stable at 109. However, the transport equipment subsector has witnessed a steep decline, with productivity dropping to 98.5, highlighting the struggles of a sector that carries significant weight in overall manufacturing performance. This stark contrast further underscores the uneven recovery across the industrial landscape, with implications for resource allocation and strategic planning.
Productivity trends reveal the economy's capacity to grow without stoking inflation. In Mexico, productivity in the secondary sector — mining, energy, construction, and especially manufacturing — signals how efficiently output expands relative to inputs. Strong productivity gains mean firms can meet demand without raising prices, easing inflation pressure and supporting sustainable wage growth. Weak productivity, by contrast, constrains supply, making cost shocks more inflationary. Manufacturing deserves closer scrutiny, as its diverse subsectors respond differently to global demand, exchange rate shifts, and investment cycles. Tracking these patterns helps judge whether growth is supported by efficiency gains or reliant on credit and labor cost increases.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
The December 2025 consumer confidence survey shows the general index at 1.30, reflecting elevated sentiment in the 89th percentile. The December 2025 consumer confidence survey shows the general index at 1.30, reflecting elevated sentiment in the 89th percentile. Despite this optimism, the durable goods sector reveals a stark contrast, with its index at an impressive 2.02, but a recent decline of 0.37 points suggests a cautious outlook. This divergence signals a complex landscape where confidence in durable goods remains robust, yet underlying uncertainties loom over the broader consumer sentiment.
Consumer confidence surveys gauge how secure households feel about their income and the economy. The general confidence index reflects overall sentiment, while sector-specific measures — such as willingness to purchase durables or housing — reveal spending appetite in categories most sensitive to interest rates. Stronger confidence supports consumption and can add inflationary pressure; weaker confidence signals caution and potential slack. For monetary policy, these indicators help anticipate whether rate moves are restraining or stimulating household demand.
COMING SOON...
Updated: 2026-02-04 by Pablo Rivas
Key Takeaways
The January 2026 SPF survey shows the aggregate Concern Index at 2.83, reflecting a dip from last month. The January 2026 SPF survey shows the aggregate Concern Index at 2.83, placing it around the 64th percentile. This index is falling, down by 0.06 from December. It's worth noting, though, that over the past year, concerns have crept up by 0.55, indicating a growing unease among economists despite this recent dip.
Economists have identified public insecurity as the leading constraint on growth, with a notable uptick in concerns over U.S. The key constraints currently cited include public insecurity at 10.1%, U.S. trade policy at 8.4%, and a lack of structural change at 4.2%. The single biggest mover this month is public insecurity, which saw a rise of 1.53 percentage points. This growing concern reflects broader anxieties about safety and stability, which could weigh heavily on economic confidence.
The perceived probability of recession stands at 25.0%, marking a moderate level of concern relative to historical norms. Recession concerns among surveyed economists are currently moderate, reflecting a 25.0% probability compared to the previous quarter. This signals a bit of unease, especially given the elevated standing relative to historical averages. Looking ahead, the probability eases to 15.0% for the next quarter, suggesting some confidence that the economy might stabilize in the near term.
According to forecasters, the peso is viewed as overvalued, indicating a persistent misalignment in expectations. FX expectations suggest the peso is overvalued, with a current-month misalignment of +0.205. This perception has been consistent across the forecast horizon, indicating a sustained belief that the peso is weaker than anticipated. Such misalignment might prompt policymakers to reconsider interventions to stabilize the currency.
Banxico's Survey of Professional Forecasters (Encuesta sobre las Expectativas de los Especialistas en Economía del Sector Privado) polls economists from major financial institutions, consultancies, and research centers. Published monthly, it captures expert views on growth constraints, inflation expectations, and recession risks before official data confirm trends. Because these respondents shape market narratives and influence investment decisions, the survey offers an early window into shifting professional sentiment — making it a valuable leading indicator for policymakers and market participants alike.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
Mexican equity markets as of February 5, 2026, show excess returns at -0.0390, reflecting a tumultuous landscape shaped by uncertainty and recent policy shifts. With data through February 1, 2026, realized volatility has climbed to 0.0083, suggesting a subtle yet discernible uptick in market fluctuations. This recent rise is punctuated by a significant drop in excess returns, which fell sharply by -0.339 compared to the previous month, indicating heightened investor caution and market hesitation. The illiquidity index remains stable at 115.8117, but its recent movement underscores a growing concern that liquidity may be tightening in the face of economic turbulence.
The decomposition shows that recent volatility has been predominantly driven by US policy shocks and escalating uncertainty, which continue to reverberate through the markets. Contributors such as US Policy Shocks and Real-Sector Difficulties have emerged as persistent factors, amplifying market reactions and shifting sentiment. Notably, the contributions from liquidity and financing have also played a crucial role, reflecting the interconnectedness of global and domestic economic conditions. As these drivers persist, they highlight the fragility of current market dynamics and the potential for further instability.
Investor sentiment remains precarious, with policy uncertainty levels reflecting a climate ripe for caution among market participants. As of February 2026, sentiment indicators such as the AAII and NAAIM show signs of trepidation, suggesting a shift toward risk aversion in investment strategies. The Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) index remains elevated, indicating that decision-makers are wrestling with the implications of both domestic and international economic policies. This complex interplay of sentiment and uncertainty signals that while markets may be leaning toward easing, the road ahead is fraught with potential volatility.
Financial market returns, volatility, and liquidity signal investor sentiment and risk appetite. Excess returns over government bonds capture the risk premium investors demand for holding equities; wider spreads suggest higher perceived risk or stronger growth prospects. Realized volatility in a stock market index reflects uncertainty — sharp swings indicate fragile sentiment and raise the cost of capital. Illiquidity shows how trading volume and price impact interact: when liquidity dries up, small trades can move prices disproportionately, amplifying shocks. For monetary policy, these indicators matter because they shape funding costs, investment flows, and the broader transmission of rate decisions into financial conditions.
Updated: 2026-02-05 by María López
Key Takeaways
Banxico's February 2026 credit release shows money market spreads at a pivotal juncture, reflecting a tightening trend that could signal opportunities for borrowers. Following the latest lending data, rate premia have narrowed significantly, with the current spread standing at 0.24, a notable contraction of -0.0654 from the previous month. This marks a 14-month stretch since the spread last exceeded today's level, hinting at a potential easing of credit conditions. As the market adjusts to a more dovish monetary stance, the implications for lending rates could translate into more favorable terms for borrowers in the near future.
Household mortgage rates remain elevated, creating a challenging landscape for new borrowers. The total annual cost of mortgages (CAT) averages 14.0%, with a range stretching from 11.1% to 28.2%. While the policy rate has passed through to some extent, the affordability of housing remains under pressure as the costs continue to rise, with a recent widening of 0.09 in the spread. This scenario could dampen demand for housing loans, particularly among first-time buyers who are already feeling the squeeze of higher rates.
Debt issuance patterns show firms leaning heavily toward fixed-rate financing, signaling a cautious approach amid economic uncertainties. Corporate financing has reached a record high, with total debt issuance normalized by GDP hitting an unprecedented index of 40. The composition reveals a preference for fixed-rate debt at 19.63%, compared to variable rates which account for 20.11% combined. This shift indicates that firms are locking in rates as a hedge against anticipated volatility, reflecting a strategic move to stabilize their financing costs in a fluctuating economic environment.
Rate premia show how market and bank funding costs move relative to the policy rate, indicating the efficiency of monetary transmission. Household mortgage rates capture the cost of long-term borrowing — their sharp rise in recent years signals affordability pressures and distributional effects, as many families face double-digit costs. Debt issuance patterns, normalized by GDP, reveal how firms finance themselves; the balance between fixed and variable rates matters for vulnerability to policy shifts. Together, these indicators show how policy rates filter into real borrowing conditions, affecting credit demand, investment, and ultimately growth and inflation dynamics.
