Understanding Mexico's economic landscape via data transformations

Key Takeaways

• The latest SHF House Price Index for Q3 2025 reveals a YoY inflation rate of 8.86%, which is about as spicy as a taco on a hot summer day.
• Now, let’s unravel the mystery of the DFM nowcast, which brings some intriguing twists to our house price saga.
• Housing is a major household asset and a key store of wealth.

The latest SHF House Price Index for Q3 2025 reveals a YoY inflation rate of 8.86%, which is about as spicy as a taco on a hot summer day. This inflation rate, reported on July 1, 2025, is comfortably above the historical average, strutting in at the 79th percentile since 2006. In the same breath, house price inflation is outpacing both the headline CPI at 3.69% and the housing CPI at 3.35%, creating a premium of over 5 percentage points in each case. Meanwhile, the DFM nowcast suggests a slight divergence from this observed rate, but let's not throw a piñata just yet; we’ll dig into that shortly.

Now, let’s unravel the mystery of the DFM nowcast, which brings some intriguing twists to our house price saga. The DFM nowcast, standing at 7.29% as of January 1, 2026, is lower than the observed 8.86%, indicating that the model detects downward pressure from auxiliary indicators like mortgage lending and CPI housing. This suggests that while house prices have been on a rollercoaster of inflation, the underlying trend is showing signs of mean reversion or cooling off, which could have implications for those still clinging to the idea of a housing bonanza. In short, the DFM is waving a caution flag, reminding us that even the hottest markets can cool down faster than a soggy tortilla.

Housing is a major household asset and a key store of wealth. Rising prices can lift balance sheets and collateral values, while falling prices can weaken credit conditions and confidence. Housing costs also shape the cost of living and affordability, making house price inflation relevant for both growth and distributional pressures in Mexico.

Key Takeaways

• Brent oil prices through December 2025 reveal a disconcerting tale, settling at $61.81, a staggering 15.6% decline year-over-year.
• Copper, on the other hand, shines like a beacon, currently priced at $11,790.96 and boasting a robust 32.3% increase over the past year.
• Corn prices are on a modest ascent, currently at $205.32, with a year-over-year rise of 1.2%.
• Commodity prices feed directly into Mexico's inflation pulse and terms of trade.

Brent oil prices through December 2025 reveal a disconcerting tale, settling at $61.81, a staggering 15.6% decline year-over-year. Brent oil prices through December 2025 reveal a disconcerting tale, settling at $61.81, a staggering 15.6% decline year-over-year. This downward trajectory, exacerbated by global supply chain disruptions and fluctuating demand, has cast a pall over Mexico's federal revenues, which hinge significantly on oil exports. With a three-day streak of decline, the implications for Pemex and the Campeche regional economy are as clear as a foggy morning: uncertainty looms large.

Copper, on the other hand, shines like a beacon, currently priced at $11,790.96 and boasting a robust 32.3% increase over the past year. Copper, on the other hand, shines like a beacon, currently priced at $11,790.96 and boasting a robust 32.3% increase over the past year. This metal's recent upward momentum—evident in a 9.1% monthly increase—reflects a burgeoning demand from the tech sector and a resurgence in global infrastructure projects. For Mexico's mining sector, particularly in Sonora, this trend offers a silver lining amidst the otherwise turbulent commodity seas.

Corn prices are on a modest ascent, currently at $205.32, with a year-over-year rise of 1.2%. Corn prices are on a modest ascent, currently at $205.32, with a year-over-year rise of 1.2%. This gentle rise, marked by a 1.8% increase in the last month, paints a picture of stability in an otherwise volatile agricultural landscape. For Mexico's 1.5 million smallholder farmers, this incremental growth brings hope, but the specter of food price inflation still lurks in the shadows.

Commodity prices feed directly into Mexico's inflation pulse and terms of trade. Oil and corn affect energy and food costs, while copper is a proxy for global industrial demand. For policymakers, sharp commodity swings can shift inflation expectations and fiscal balances, making these prices critical to monitor.

Key Takeaways

• The February 2026 IMSS release shows unit labor costs at 3.12%, indicating wages are outpacing productivity.
• Real wages in the formal sector are on the rise, signaling an improvement in purchasing power for workers.
• Across sectors, manufacturing and retail diverge in real wage growth, with manufacturing significantly outperforming retail.

The February 2026 IMSS release shows unit labor costs at 3.12%, indicating wages are outpacing productivity. Following February's formal sector wage data, ULC in manufacturing is rising, reflecting the pressure of wages growing faster than productivity. This latest reading sits at the 72nd percentile, with a slight monthly decrease of -0.32%. The implications are clear: businesses may face cost-push inflation, which could squeeze margins and impact competitiveness.

Real wages in the formal sector are on the rise, signaling an improvement in purchasing power for workers. Real wages have increased to 5.61%, up 1.54% from the previous month. This growth not only signifies positive gains for households but also enhances consumer spending potential, which is essential for driving economic growth amidst uncertainties.

Across sectors, manufacturing and retail diverge in real wage growth, with manufacturing significantly outperforming retail. Manufacturing real wages have surged, while retail has lagged, illustrating a stark contrast in sectoral health. This gap highlights the resilience of manufacturing amidst economic pressures, while retail struggles with slower wage advancements, suggesting a potential reallocation of labor and investment in the coming months.

Unit labor costs (ULC) measure the average cost of labor per unit of output — when wages grow faster than productivity, ULC rises, potentially squeezing profit margins and fueling inflation. In Mexico, where the formal sector employs roughly half the workforce, IMSS-registered wage data captures trends in the formal economy but misses the informal sector's dynamics. Real wages — nominal wages adjusted for inflation — determine household purchasing power and underpin consumer demand. For policymakers, these indicators help balance inflation control, competitiveness, and the economic welfare of Mexican workers.

Twelve-month-ahead forecasts for unit labor costs and real wages in manufacturing and retail are produced using a Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous inputs (SARIMAX) model. The model is estimated on seasonally adjusted month-over-month percentage changes, with all four series — ULC manufacturing, ULC retail, real wage manufacturing, and real wage retail — entering as joint endogenous variables. No external auxiliary data feed the forecast; the model relies solely on the internal dynamics and cross-series interactions of the wage and productivity data. Forecast confidence intervals widen over the projection horizon.

Out-of-sample backtest over 24 evaluation windows using the SARIMAX. Out-of-sample backtest over 24 evaluation windows using the SARIMAX. RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. ULC Manufacturing (RMSE 2.97 vs 3.21 naive, +7% improvement, n=24); ULC Retail (RMSE 5.33 vs 5.22 naive, n=23); Real Wage Manufacturing (RMSE 2.20 vs 2.62 naive, +16% improvement, n=24); Real Wage Retail (RMSE 3.05 vs 2.97 naive, n=23).

Key Takeaways

• The latest ENOE survey shows unemployment at 2.64%, signaling a continued tight labor market.
• By gender, the employment landscape reveals stark contrasts.
• The share of informal workers is on the rise, signaling potential vulnerabilities in the labor market.

The latest ENOE survey shows unemployment at 2.64%, signaling a continued tight labor market. The March 2026 ENOE survey shows unemployment at 2.64%, remaining at a historically low level around the 1st percentile. This marks a slight decrease of 0.147% from the previous month, reflecting ongoing strength in labor demand despite external uncertainties. With volatility in the unemployment rate near the 86th percentile historically, this stability suggests a labor market that's resilient, but caution is warranted given the backdrop of economic policy uncertainty.

By gender, the employment landscape reveals stark contrasts. Male and female unemployment rates are currently at 3.33% and 3.53%, respectively, both hovering around the 17th percentile. While the male unemployment rate has dipped slightly by 0.0097%, the female unemployment rate saw a marginal decline of 0.00467%. This slight divergence underscores persistent challenges for women in the job market, hinting at the need for targeted policies to boost female employment.

The share of informal workers is on the rise, signaling potential vulnerabilities in the labor market. The share of informal employment now stands at 55.6%, reflecting a modest increase of 0.0141% from last month. This trend contrasts with the overall unemployment stability and suggests an uptick in workers seeking less secure, informal jobs amid economic uncertainties. The rising informality could pose risks to long-term economic stability, as these jobs typically lack benefits and protections.

Labor slack and its composition shape inflation pressure, policy timing, and social risk. Unemployment, underemployment, and unemployment by gender reveal how broad and uneven slack is. In Mexico's large informal sector, the informal employment share can swing sharply — often contracting faster in downturns as unprotected jobs are cut first, then rebounding early — masking true slack if headline unemployment alone is tracked. Tracking these dimensions helps distinguish cyclical slack from structural mismatches and calibrate monetary policy accordingly.

Between quarterly ENOE survey releases, a Dynamic Factor Model (DFM) nowcasts employment indicators using higher-frequency auxiliary data. The model ingests monthly series — industrial production, consumer confidence, capacity utilization, retail sales, and private consumption — alongside quarterly GDP components to extract common factors that track the business cycle. When any auxiliary series receives new data, the Kalman filter updates the nowcast, providing an early signal before the next official employment release.

Out-of-sample backtest over 15 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). Out-of-sample backtest over 15 evaluation windows using the Dynamic Factor Model (DFM). RMSE measures the typical forecast error in the same units as the series; 'naive' is a no-change benchmark. Unemployment (RMSE 0.33 vs 0.11 naive, n=12); Underemployment (RMSE 1.25 vs 0.49 naive, n=10); Male Unemployment (RMSE 0.27 vs 0.25 naive, n=10); Female Unemployment (RMSE 0.27 vs 0.27 naive, +0% improvement, n=10).

Key Takeaways

• INEGI's Q4 2025 productivity release shows secondary sector output at 102, continuing its recent upward trend.
• Across the PCA indices, manufacturing composites show a concerning divergence in performance.
• Within manufacturing, the top-performing subsectors shine a spotlight on food production, while transport equipment remains in the dumps.
• Productivity trends reveal the economy's capacity to grow without stoking inflation.

INEGI's Q4 2025 productivity release shows secondary sector output at 102, continuing its recent upward trend. The latest INEGI productivity data for Q4 2025, released in December, indicates that the secondary sector productivity index is at 102, reflecting a 3-month upward streak. This growth is largely driven by construction, which has soared to an impressive 106, while mining continues to lag behind at a mere 89.8. Notably, this growth seems to be more concentrated in construction rather than being broad-based across all industries, hinting that while some sectors are thriving, others are still digging themselves out of a hole.

Across the PCA indices, manufacturing composites show a concerning divergence in performance. The composite indices reveal a mixed bag: while productivity is at a modest 0.281, sales have been robust, rising to 0.61, suggesting that demand is still alive and kicking. However, labor demand is on a downward trajectory at -1.49, raising eyebrows about the sustainability of this growth. This divergence between sales and labor demand could signal future challenges—because let’s face it, if the demand is there but the workforce isn’t, we might just be throwing a party with no one to serve the drinks.

Within manufacturing, the top-performing subsectors shine a spotlight on food production, while transport equipment remains in the dumps. The top-performing subsectors include food, which is cruising at 111, a solid indicator of consumer demand, while transport equipment languishes at a dismal 82, reflecting ongoing struggles in that area. Given that food accounts for 18.86% of total manufacturing, its strong performance is undoubtedly propping up the overall figures. Meanwhile, the stark contrast with transport equipment underscores the uneven recovery within the manufacturing landscape—it's like a feast where some are dining lavishly while others are still waiting for their plates.

Productivity trends reveal the economy's capacity to grow without stoking inflation. In Mexico, productivity in the secondary sector — mining, energy, construction, and especially manufacturing — signals how efficiently output expands relative to inputs. Strong productivity gains mean firms can meet demand without raising prices, easing inflation pressure and supporting sustainable wage growth. Weak productivity, by contrast, constrains supply, making cost shocks more inflationary. Manufacturing deserves closer scrutiny, as its diverse subsectors respond differently to global demand, exchange rate shifts, and investment cycles. Tracking these patterns helps judge whether growth is supported by efficiency gains or reliant on credit and labor cost increases.

Key Takeaways

• The February 2026 SPF survey reveals a modest decline in economic sentiment.
• The evolving landscape of economic constraints highlights significant concerns for policymakers.
• Recession concerns are currently perceived to be moderate among economists.
• Current FX expectations indicate that forecasters see the peso as overvalued against the dollar.

The February 2026 SPF survey reveals a modest decline in economic sentiment. The February 2026 SPF survey shows the aggregate Concern Index at 2.82, placing it around the 62nd percentile. This marks a slight decrease of 0.01 from the previous month, reflecting a continued trend of concern that has now persisted for three months. The implications of this decline suggest that while sentiment remains relatively elevated, there is a cautious outlook among economists regarding the immediate economic landscape.

The evolving landscape of economic constraints highlights significant concerns for policymakers. Economists have identified public insecurity as the foremost constraint, comprising 11.23% of the responses, followed closely by US trade policy at 7.64% and a lack of structural change at 4.40%. Notably, public insecurity has increased by 1.16% month-over-month, underscoring the growing anxiety surrounding safety and stability. Such persistent concerns signal potential challenges for both domestic and foreign investment confidence.

Recession concerns are currently perceived to be moderate among economists. The perceived probability of recession stands at 25.0% for the current quarter, positioning it in the 75th percentile historically, suggesting elevated concern relative to past norms. This moderate level reflects a cautious sentiment, as expectations for the next quarter indicate a slight decline to 20.0%. These figures may indicate a stabilizing economic outlook but also highlight the need for vigilance in monitoring underlying risks.

Current FX expectations indicate that forecasters see the peso as overvalued against the dollar. According to forecasters, the current month's misalignment shows the peso perceived as overvalued by 0.157, a signal of potential weakness in the currency relative to expectations. This sentiment persists across shorter-term forecasts, suggesting a consistent view of the peso's valuation over the coming months. Such perceptions could have implications for trade and investment flows, further complicating the economic landscape.

Banxico's Survey of Professional Forecasters (Encuesta sobre las Expectativas de los Especialistas en Economía del Sector Privado) polls roughly 40 groups of analysts from banks, financial institutions, consultancies, and research centers. Responses are collected during the second half of each reference month — typically between the 15th and 28th — and results are published on the first business day of the following month. Because respondents form their expectations before some end-of-month official data releases, the survey provides an early window into shifting professional sentiment on inflation, growth constraints, recession risk, and exchange rates, making it a valuable leading indicator for policymakers and market participants.

Key Takeaways

• Banxico's March 2026 credit release shows money market spreads tightening amidst a backdrop of economic uncertainty.
• Household mortgage rates remain challenging for borrowers, with the total annual cost (CAT) averaging 13.9% and ranging from 11.1% to 28.2%.
• Debt issuance patterns show a stark preference for fixed-rate financing, which now constitutes 18.31% of GDP.

Banxico's March 2026 credit release shows money market spreads tightening amidst a backdrop of economic uncertainty. Rate premia reveal that funding and TIIE spreads are currently hovering below the policy rate, with the TIIE 28d at 0.20% and TIIE 91d at 0.24%. This month, the spread narrowed by 0.092%, signaling a tightening trend that reflects cautious lending amid declining inflation and a softening economic outlook. The narrowing spreads indicate that lenders are becoming more accommodating, which could stimulate borrowing despite the overall economic jitters.

Household mortgage rates remain challenging for borrowers, with the total annual cost (CAT) averaging 13.9% and ranging from 11.1% to 28.2%. The total annual cost of mortgages suggests that while affordability is under pressure, the pass-through of policy rate changes is limited. This scenario complicates the borrowing landscape for potential homeowners, as higher costs may deter new mortgage applications and dampen housing market activity.

Debt issuance patterns show a stark preference for fixed-rate financing, which now constitutes 18.31% of GDP. This tilt towards fixed rates highlights a strategic shift among firms aiming to hedge against potential interest rate volatility. As firms opt for more stable financing options, it raises questions about the future appetite for variable-rate debt amidst ongoing economic policy uncertainty.

Rate premia show how market and bank funding costs move relative to the policy rate, indicating the efficiency of monetary transmission. Household mortgage rates capture the cost of long-term borrowing — their sharp rise in recent years signals affordability pressures and distributional effects, as many families face double-digit costs. Debt issuance patterns, normalized by GDP, reveal how firms finance themselves; the balance between fixed and variable rates matters for vulnerability to policy shifts. Together, these indicators show how policy rates filter into real borrowing conditions, affecting credit demand, investment, and ultimately growth and inflation dynamics.